IssuesNew York’s forests cover over 19 million acres of land - 64% of the state’s land area. While state-owned forests in the Catskills and Adirondacks are the most iconic and recognized forests in the state, three quarters – or 14.4 million acres – of New York’s forests are privately owned. What’s at stake are several hundred thousand family forest landowners who own less than 100 acres of forest and viable forest markets for timber, fiber, and biomass. Building on New York’s legacy of forestland stewardship, an extraordinary opportunity lies in investing more deeply in assisting private forest landowners and the forest products industry to secure and sustain the multiple benefits that forests provide. Forests as a Natural Solution to Climate Change
Forests and the Ecology they Support Forests have an important role to play in New York’s efforts to protect and manage the environment.
Forests and the Communities they Sustain Forests provide New York’s residents and communities with tremendous benefits that contribute to public health, quality of life, and resilience at little or no cost to the community at large.
Forest Products and the Economy they Create Wood harvested from New York’s forests annually supplies markets around the world and forest management, harvesting, and local manufacturing supports a significant forest economy in New York.
Policy Priorities for the SFY 2024-25 Budget The Empire State Forest Products Association strongly supports opportunities sustaining and growing the benefits of New York’s forests and forest-based economy. Offered here are our highest priorities within the SFY 2024-25 Budget.
ESFPA supports increasing the EPF to $500 million per year and devoting $10 million of an added $100 million increase in the EPF can significantly impact private forest stewardship and enhance our forest-based bioeconomy for years to come. Since 2018 we have added lines in the EPF for forests and the forest-based economy, but none have come to the scale necessary for meaningful impact. Every line has demonstrated its value and return, but much more needs to be done. The following is proposed for 2025: a.) ESFPA supports the following funding in existing lines in the EPF: i. WPDC at $200,000.
ii. Regenerate NY cost share to private landowners ($500,000) asking for an increase to $3.4 million.
iii. Urban Forestry ($3.2 million) asking for an increase to $3.4 million.
iv. Climate & Applied Forestry Research Program ($1.5 million) asking for an increase to $2 million.
b.) ESFPA supports a new line in the EPF for a Private Forest Stewardship Initiative. i. $300,000 for New York Logger Training and Forestry Works.
ii. $1 million for the Bioeconomy Institute at SUNY ESF.
iii. $1.5 million for Forestry Connects at Cornell CALS.
iv. $2.8 million for Soil & Water Conservation Districts to support outreach and projects.
2. $1 Billion Sustainable Futures Fund a.) ESFPA supports the Governor’s request for a $1 billion Sustainable Futures Program to help fund climate mitigation and adaptation. ESFPA is suggesting that solid waste recycling projects and Existing Burdens Reports for Disadvantaged Communities be eligible projects 3. Title Insurance (TED Part TT): a.) ESFPA supports the Governor’s legislation which would authorize the Attorney General to accept from any reputable commercial insurer, a title policy naming the people of the state of New York as insured, with such policy to cover any title defects which would otherwise render the title unmarketable. 4. Extended Producer Responsibility Legislation:
a.) ESFPA is looking for better recognition of the unique characteristics of paper under any proposals for Extended Producer Responsible (EPR) program. i. Paper has a high recovery and recycling rates (67% in 2023)
ii. Paper recovery has in place an advanced and working private sector model.
iii. Paper is the only covered product that cannot be infinitely recycled. Constant need for new fibers.
iv. Avoid unintended consequences of mandated rates & dates, minimum recycled content, toxicity requirements in paper and packaging, and the lack of manufacturer/producer engagement.
v. Potential unintended impacts on New York’s two (Sylvamo and Finch) vertically integrated mills and the role that low-grade markets have on healthy forests.
|